Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Lots of people are talkin' up the new Destroyer album, including Pitchfork and the Salon.com music critic, many going so far as to compare him to Bob Dylan, for reasons I'm not quite sure I understand. I've tried to get into Destroyer with little avail, including being totally underwhelmed by his live show opening for the New Pornographers (though I did heartily enjoy the increasingly drunken performance Dan Bejar later gave with the Pornos). I feel like there's something I don't quite "get" about Destroyer, and maybe if I could figure it out, I'd be a huge fan too. I think I need a Destroyer fan to explain to me what the appeal of his music is, and since Salon is posting a free download from the album over the next three days ("the three best tracks" he says), I'll give them a try and see if they stand out over everything else I've heard. If I still can't get into it after that, it'll be time to give up.

1 comment:

Mike H. said...

I can see why this disc is causing a stir. It's really dense -- there are tons of ideas packed in to this record. Combine that with a few epic, 7+ minute songs, and you have a standard pallette for a critical darling-type record.

The Dylan comparisons are justified too I think. It's not just the voice (which is to say at least similar on an abrasiveness scale) but the arrangements and the complexity of the tunes really lend themselves to the mid-70s era Dylan like what he did on Desire and the subsequent live outfit the Rolling Thunder Review. Not to mention 1970s Dylan was druggie Dylan and I think we all know that Bejar has some substance issues. Hey, show me a good record that came from a musician of "healthy mind and body" and I'll show you a dozen better ones that came from heartbreak and addiction.

But anyway, another thing about Rubies is that, while it's not packed with hooks the way a New Pornos record is, it has hooks and they're sprinkled into the nooks and crannies of the songs. I found myself digging certain moments that I never saw coming.